After a year using RSpec, I’m happy to share “(My) RSpec Best Practices and Tips”. Let’s make your specs easier to maintain, less verbose, more structured and covering more cases!
Use shortcuts specify {}, it {} and subject {}
You think RSpec is verbose? In case your code doesn’t need any description, use a specify block!
it "should be valid" do @user.should be_valid end
can be replaced with
specify { @user.should be_valid }
RSpec will generate a nice description text for you when running this expectation. Even better, you can use the it block!
describe User do it { should validate_presence_of :name } it { should have_one :address } end
In case the subject is the not the class described, just set it with the subject method:
subject { @user.address } it { should be_valid }
Start context with ‘when’/'with’ and methods description with ‘#’
Have you ever get a failed test with an incomprehensible error message like:
User non confirmed confirm email wrong token should not be valid
Start your contexts with when and get nice messages like:
User when non confirmed when #confirm_email with wrong token should not be valid
Use RSpec matchers to get meaningful messages
In case of failure
specify { user.valid?.should == true }
displays:
'User should == true' FAILED expected: true, got: false (using ==)
While
specify { user.should be_valid }
displays:
'User should be valid' FAILED expected valid? to return true, got false
Nice eh?
Only one expectation per it block
I often see specs where it blocks contain several expectations. This makes your tests harder to read and maintain.
So instead of that…
describe DemoMan do it "should have expected attributes" do demo_man = DemoMan.new demo_man.should respond_to :name demo_man.should respond_to :gender demo_man.should respond_to :age end end
… do this:
describe DemoMan do before(:all) do @demo_man = DemoMan.new end subject { @demo_man } it { should respond_to :name } it { should respond_to :gender } it { should respond_to :age } end
(Over)use describe and context
Big specs can be a joy to play with as long as they are ordered and DRY. Use nested describe and context blocks as much as you can, each level adding its own specificity in the before block.
To check your specs are well organized, run them in ‘nested’ mode (spec spec/my_spec.rb -cf nested
).
Using before(:each)
in each context and describe blocks will help you set up the environment without repeating yourself. It also enables you to use it {} blocks.
Bad:
describe User do it "should save when name is not empty" do User.new(:name => 'Alex').save.should == true end it "should not save when name is empty" do User.new.save.should == false end it "should not be valid when name is empty" do User.new.should_not be_valid end it "should be valid when name is not empty" do User.new(:name => 'Alex').should be_valid end it "should give the user a flower when gender is W" do User.new(:gender => 'W').present.should be_a Flower end it "should give the user a iMac when gender is M" do User.new(:gender => 'M').present.should be_an IMac end end
Good:
describe User do before { @user = User.new } subject { @user } context "when name empty" do it { should not be_valid } specify { @user.save.should == false } end context "when name not empty" do before { @user.name = 'Sam' } it { should be_valid } specify { @user.save.should == true } end describe :present do subject { @user.present } context "when user is a W" do before { @user.gender = 'W' } it { should be_a Flower } end context "when user is a M" do before { @user.gender = 'M' } it { should be_an IMac } end end end
Test Valid, Edge and Invalid cases
This is called Boundary value analysis, it’s simple and it will help you to cover the most important cases. Just split-up method’s input or object’s attributes into valid and invalid partitions and test both of them and there boundaries. A method specification might look like that:
describe "#month_in_english(month_id)" do context "when valid" do it "should return 'January' for 1" # lower boundary it "should return 'March' for 3" it "should return 'December' for 12" # upper boundary context "when invalid" do it "should return nil for 0" it "should return nil for 13" end end
I hope this will help you improve your specs. Let me know if I missed anything! :)
You could also be interested in (My) Cucumber best practices and tips or rspec-set a little gem that helps you speeding up your model specs.
Pingback: 13時のヘッドライン | CROSS SBM
Pingback: Notional Slurry » links for 2010-03-31
Pingback: rspec Short Forms « Trevor Oke
Pingback: (My) Cucumber best practices and tips | EggsOnBread
Pingback: Show validation errors in RSpec be_valid output using a custom matcher
Pingback: Cucumber Tips | VersaPay
Pingback: links for 2011-06-02 « Bloggitation